Oil and gas operators are finding that their floods can be much more effective at increasing recovery if they design with directional permeability in mind. Whether you’re injecting water, polymer, or gas, directional permeability can harm or help your flood.
Pools with directional permeability preferentially flow in one direction. Permeability along the preferential axis can be 1000 times the permeability orthogonal to that axis.
Directional permeability can be caused by several factors including fractures, faults and facies.
Many areas of the Pembina Cardium also have strong directional permeability trends. These will significantly impact the use of multi-frac horizontal wells in flooding.
Most pools in Alberta exhibit some directional permeability.
For example, the Loon Slave Point G Pool in northern Alberta has such significant directional permeability that wells on trend water out almost immediately, but wells off-trend take years to see a water shock front.
In the pattern displayed in the accompanying illustration, Well A was on preferred permeability trend with the injector. This well watered out within 3 months even though it was almost ¾ of a mile away.
On the other hand, Well B was less than a half mile away but didn’t see a shock front for 9 years – it was off the preferential permeability trend. After injection, Well B’s oil rate increased six-fold due to the support of the water.
By taking advantage of the directional permeability trend, the operator of the flood has experienced a three-fold increase in recovery. Primary recovery factor for the pool was 5%. After the operator decided to use the directional permeability trend, secondary recover factor jumped to 15%.
~Granger J. Low
Back to top^ |