Noncompliance in voidage replacement ratio (VRR) is the single most common source of enhanced recovery compliance action. What’s the relief? In
some of your floods, you’re not injecting sufficient make up
water to maintain reservoir pressure. You know it and you’d like
to change it. But you’re prevented by circumstances.
On some pools you’re prevented from meeting
voidage by a shortage of injectant. On some pools, you’re so far
behind that you can never catch up. Some pools are so far along
in their life that trying to meet voidage doesn’t make sense.
There is a regulatory pendulum in the oil
industry. When it’s at its most proximal position, the AER is
very strict in its interpretations when approving applications.
When it’s at its most distal position, the regulator is much
more lenient in what it will approve.
Do you have a water flood that is not meeting
its regulatory VRR requirements as stated in the approval
document?
Currently the AER (formerly the ERCB) is more
lenient in VRR regulating than they have been in the past.
Many approval documents state that the
operator must inject so as to maintain a cumulative VRR of unity
and that the operator shall target a VRR of unity monthly.
However, exceptions to a strictly balanced
VRR can be approved if justified. Proven knows how to justify
these eccentric approvals.
Do you have a flood that needs a compliance
tune-up? Call Proven now for a risk free quote.
~Granger J. Low
Back to top^ |